Verbindung zwischen den Sowjets und Ayatollah Chomeini und dem iranischen Regime.

Erzählen Sie uns mehr über die Verbindung zwischen den Sowjets und Ayatollah Chomeini und dem iranischen Regime.
Diese Verbindung besteht schon lange und sie ist ziemlich kompliziert. Zunächst ist zu sagen, dass das fundamentalistische Regime im Iran durch einen sehr seltsamen Zufall der Geschichte entstanden ist.
Die iranische Revolution 1979 war von den Sowjets schon seit dem Ende des Zweiten Weltkriegs sehr gründlich vorbereitet worden, aber es hätte eine kommunistische Revolution werden sollen. Die Islamisten waren anfangs nur Mitläufer, aber im entscheidenden Moment stellte sich der wichtigste Agentenführer des KGB in Teheran, Wladimir Kuzichkin, als Doppelagent des britischen MI6 heraus. Er gab ihnen die vollständigen Informationen über das gesamte Subversionsnetzwerk der Sowjets im Iran. Die Briten leiteten es an den Schah weiter und nachher bekamen die Islamisten diese Informationen in die Finger und dann konnten sie alle sowjetischen Agenten und alle iranischen Kommunisten verhaften, das ganze, hervorragend aufgebaute subversive Netzwerk.
Das war der Zeitpunkt, als die Islamisten wirklich zur “Dritten Kraft” im Kalten Krieg des Nahen Ostens wurden. Die Sowjets und ihre “roten arabischen” Satelliten standen vor der schwierigen Entscheidung, entweder eine Allianz mit den Ayatollahs gegen den Westen einzugehen oder einen Krieg gegen sie zu führen. Der syrische Diktator Hafiz Assad wollte ein Bündnis und der irakische Diktator Saddam Hussein wollte Krieg, den er schliesslich ohne die Zustimmung Moskaus begann. Bis zu diesem Zeitpunkt hatte Moskau die Assad-Linie praktisch akzeptiert.
Im Jahr 1987 schrieb einer von Gorbatschows Beratern in einem vertraulichen Memorandum: “Natürlich spielt Assad sein eigenes Spiel mit uns, obwohl er glaubt, dass er Recht hat. Der Grund warum wir ihn jetzt brauchen ist nicht mal der Nahe Osten… sondern der Iran nach Chomeini (die Syrer haben die verschiedenen Schichten der iranischen Gesellschaft stark unterwandert).”
Zur selben Zeit begannen die Sowjets über Assad und Yasser Arafat aktiv im Geheimen nach Kontakten im Iran zu suchen. Als Reaktion darauf schickte Chomeini 1989 plötzlich ein Schreiben an Gorbatschow mit der Empfehlung, dass es an der Zeit sei, den Marxismus aufzugeben und die Sowjetunion in eine islamische Republik umzuwandeln. Das gesamte Politbüro hielt sich die Bäuche vor Lachen. Gorbatschow antwortete natürlich, dass er ein ebenso loyaler Kommunist sei wie die anderen, aber sie könnten trotzdem an vielen Fronten zusammenarbeiten und das taten sie auch.
Wie die Protokolle ihrer Verhandlungen zeigen, diskutierten die Sowjets und die Iraner bereits über eine Zusammenarbeit auf solchen Gebieten, wie man etwa die Amerikaner vom Indischen Ozean vertreiben könne, oder darüber, eine strategische Eisenbahnverbindung zu errichten, welche die Sowjetunion durch den Iran mit dem Persischen Golf verbinden würde, ausserdem ging es um technologische Fragen und ja, auch um Kernenergie. Ayatollah Rafsandschani wollte seinen Sohn “als Symbol der sowjetisch-iranischen Freundschaft” sogar mit einer sowjetischen Raumfähre ins Weltall schicken. Es gibt auch Aufzeichnungen darüber, dass Gorbatschow seinem Politbüro vorschlug, dass die Sowjets geheime Waffenlieferungen für den Iran über die Tschechoslowakei oder Ungarn organisieren könnten.
Als Chomeini noch im selben Jahr starb und weitaus zynischere Leute nachfolgten, hörten die Versuche auf, die Russen zum Islam zu bekehren und es wurde rasch ein pragmatisches, aber sehr enges anti-westliches Bündnis zwischen Moskau und Teheran geschmiedet. Trotz einiger gelegentlicher Täuschungsmanöver und Finten besteht diese Allianz mit Sicherheit noch bis zum heutigen Tag.

http://archiv.metropolico.org/2012/10/23/die-sowjetische-dschihad-connection/


The mullahs did not come to rule in Iran on the basis of their own power; they were placed in power by men more evil than they - who would use the depravity of backwardness for their own ends.
In September 1975, the Aspen Institute held a symposium in Persepolis, Iran. The public side of the transactions was published years later under the title of Iran: Past, Present, and Future. In the behind-the-scenes discussion, the plans for reversing the Shah's industrialization program and for turning Iran into a model dark ages regime were mapped out. It is a bitter twist of history, that the Shah and his wife Empress Farah Diba witlessly provided huge amounts of funding to the Aspen project.
From 1975 onward, the Aspen Institute developed closer and closer links to the Iranian ministry of education through well-placed agents like Manuchehr Ganji, who introduced both Marvin Zonis 'and the Aspen Institute itself to Iran. Catherine Bateson, of Damavand College in Teheran, was a critical participant in this strategy, sowing the seeds of "antimaterialist" rebellion among Iran's youth.
The word also went to Professor Ali Shariati to intensify his activity. More than anyone else, Shariati was the guiding light behind the Iranian students and intellectuals who brought about the Muslim Brotherhood revolution. Shariati's special ability was to be able to cast the mystical, antiscience Sufi doctrines into terms that might be accepted by modern young people not trained in religious law. Iran's youth could not be won over directly to Khomeini 5 version of Shusm, so it was necessary to create Ali Shariati, who disguised the Sufi doctrines in a radical, almost Marxist cloak. Shariati is the originator of so-called Islamic Marxism.
Traveling often between Paris and Teheran, Shariati built up a cult following among the youth of Iran. He introduced Iranian students to the works of Jean-Paul Sartre, Frantz Fanon, Albert Camus, Jacques Berque, and Louis Massignon, all writers of the anticapitalist existentialist swamp, all funded and guided by the same Club of Rome networks that gathered at Persepolis.
Through his writings and the publication of his Farsi journal, Shariati became something of a legend. In 1977, he was apparently murdered, and although his cult followers-like Ibrahim Yazdi-blamed the Shah for his death, it is more likely that he was killed by his backers in the Savak in order to create a martyr that would spark a movement around his figure. Were it not for Shariati, few students in Iran's universities would have followed ~ the mad Khomeini.
As the Aspen Institute and Shariati began agitating against the Shah, in early 1977 the Club of Rome's Peccei, Jacques Freymond, and others hegan to focus the Muslim Brotherhood in Western Europe around a new, synthetic, zero-growth version of Islam. Called "Islam and the West," this project held its first planning sessions at Cambridge University in England. Under the guidance of Peccei, Lord Caradon, and Muslim Brotherhood leader Maarouf Dawalibi, "Islam and the West" assembled a policy outline on science and technology for the subversion of Islam. The outline was published in 1979, and backed by the International Federation of Institutes of Advanced Study, headed by Club of Rome member and NATO science adviser Alexander King.

http://www.conspiracyschool.com/node/211

http://www.conspiracyschool.com/sites/default/files/resources/Hostage%20to%20Khomeini.pdf


Like it or not, radical Islam is on the rise. And the group spearheading this rise is Muslim Brotherhood. Wherever political Islam is gaining ground, one is almost guaranteed to find the hands of the Muslim Brotherhood.
Was the alliance between the CIA and the Brotherhood merely a continuation of the alliance between British intelligence and the Brotherhood? According to the authors of Dope, Inc., the OSS, which was the forerunner of the CIA, was merely a subsidiary of British intelligence . When the Office of Strategic Services was being organized, William Stephenson, Britain’s Special Operations Executive representative in the United States, was brought in for “technical assistance” . Stephenson’s involvement would lead to the creation of “a British SOE fifth column embedded deeply into the American official intelligence community” . When it came to religious engineering to promote fanaticism within the Arab world, it could be that the British power elite passed the mantle to the American power elite.
Khomeini’s rise to power in Iran was a major victory for the Muslim Brotherhood that stood behind him, and Western intelligence had made no small contribution to that victory. Make no mistake, Western intelligence helped make the Muslim Brotherhood what it is today. When looking for someone to blame for the rise of radical Islam, the accusatory finger must be pointed at those in whom Americans have placed their trust.

http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/2014/11/24/western-intelligence-and-the-rise-of-the-muslim-brotherhood/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British%E2%80%93Ruhollah_Khomeini_conspiracy_theory

http://www.larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1979/eirv06n27-19790710/eirv06n27-19790710_039-the_ayatollah_khomeini_is_a_sava.pdf


Dr. Ronen Bergman, an Israeli investigative journalist and author of the 2008 book, 'The Secret War with Iran,' says that the BBC put Khomeini on a public pedestal and amplified his voice, making his brand of Islamic revolution the only alternative option to the Shah's rule.
British journalist Ed West interviewed Bergman in June 2009 about his views, and quoted a passage from Bergman's book in his article, "How the BBC helped bring the Ayatollah to power":
In the book he writes: "Another propaganda tool for Khomeini was none other than the Persian-language broadcasts of the British Broadcasting Corporation. The channel gave him a platform. His regular broadcasts made him the unchallenged leader of the Iranian revolutionary movement."
When we met in a west London hotel not far from the notorious Iranian embassy, Bergman pointed out: "The BBC gave free hours of free broadcast to Khomeini from Paris. It is unbelievable. Every time there is a person who is fighting 'royal' forces, in the sense of their being autocratic, the BBC gives them a free hand and carte blanche, without trying to understand what their views are.

http://disquietreservations.blogspot.de/2011/11/british-and-us-governments-installed.html

 From Hostage to Khomeini, "It was the alliance between the Freemasons, the old landowners and the clergy that mounted the operation against the Shah in 1963. Its leader was Khomeini, but only as a symbol....The Voice of Iran reports that "Since his student days, Khomeini received monthly payments from British agents and was in constant contact with his masters." p.88

https://www.henrymakow.com/why_the_west_created_iran_want.html


It was at this critical juncture that Israel and Iran began to restore their historic secret alliance. The origin of the Israeli-Iranian relationship dates back to the 1950s, when emerging radical Arab nationalist movements and governments caused much anxiety both in Tel Aviv and Tehran. Although Iran had recognized Israel in 1950, relations between the two countries at first remained distant.
The unification of Egypt and Syria in 1958 seemed to be transforming Arab nationalism into a dynamic political and ideological force. Israel and Iran, both of which greatly feared Arab unity, saw these first tangible steps toward it as a major threat. By the early 1960s, therefore, the Israeli-Iranian relationship had evolved to include trade as well as military intelligence cooperation and coordination. David Ben Gurion, Golda Meir, Abba Eban, Yitzhak Rabin, Yigal Allon, Moshe Dayan, Menachem Begin, and many lesser Israeli leaders visited Iran and discussed the common interests between the two countries with the shah.
After the fall of the shah, Ghorbanifar and other such former Savak agents proved to be extremely useful to Israel because they continued to maintain their contracts with the Israelis while working for the Khomeini regime. Their central role in the Iranian-Israeli (and U.S.) relationship was made possible by Khomeini's decision to leave the shah's secret police untouched. Beyond executing three former chiefs of Savak and changing the name of the remaining organization to Savama, the Khomeini regime did little to alter its functions. Many of its agents were called back and assigned the same duties by the Khomeini regime that they had performed for the shah.

https://www.wrmea.org/1988-april/khomeini-s-iran-israel-s-ally.html

 In a recent exclusive article for World Net Daily, former Soviet-bloc Romanian intelligence officer Lt. General Ion Mihai Pacepa writes how the recent wave of Islamic radicalism in the Middle East, from the Arab Spring to the recent 9/11/2012 Benghazi and Cairo attacks, were not the work of spontaneous attacks, but rather the result of a decades-long carefully planned operation by the Soviet Union.

https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/asia/item/13069-russian-red-jihad